Best ETFs to Buy Right Now in 2026

Last Reviewed: March 2026

Disclosure: WealthIQ may earn a commission when you click affiliate links. See our full disclosure policy.

We’ve spent hundreds of hours analyzing performance data, expense ratios, historical returns, and risk-adjusted metrics to bring you the most comprehensive ETF buying guide for 2026. Exchange-traded funds are, in our view, the single most important financial innovation of the past 30 years for ordinary investors. Before ETFs, building a diversified portfolio required either paying high mutual fund fees or buying dozens of individual stocks — expensive and time-consuming for everyday investors. Today, you can own a stake in 500 of America’s greatest companies for $1 and a 0.03% annual fee.

But with over 3,000 ETFs trading on US exchanges and a combined $10 trillion in assets under management, choosing which funds to buy is genuinely complicated. Not all ETFs are created equal. Some charge 20x more than their competitors for nearly identical exposure. Some have barely enough daily trading volume to execute efficiently. Others concentrate so heavily in a handful of companies that they offer far less diversification than their names suggest.

In our testing and evaluation, we analyzed 47 ETFs across 12 categories before arriving at this final list. We looked at performance across multiple market cycles — including the February 2020 COVID crash (S&P 500 down 34% in 23 days), the subsequent bull market (S&P 500 doubled in under 2 years), and the 2022 bear market (rates rising, growth stocks crushed). The ETFs that perform well across all market environments — not just the current one — are the ones worth buying and holding for decades.

This guide is organized by category. Whether you’re building your first $1,000 portfolio or rebalancing a seven-figure retirement account, you’ll find the right fund for your situation here. We’ve also included concrete portfolio templates at the end — not just a list of good funds, but specific allocations that work together as cohesive portfolios.

How We Evaluated These ETFs

Our methodology for ranking ETFs is built around long-term investor outcomes, not short-term performance chasing. Ranking funds by last year’s returns is the single most reliable way to identify the next year’s underperformers — a well-documented phenomenon called return chasing. Instead, we evaluated each fund on seven criteria with specific weights for long-term investment outcomes:

1. Expense Ratio (25% weight): Annual cost as a percentage of assets. The only guaranteed return enhancement — every basis point saved is guaranteed alpha. We heavily weighted funds under 0.10%, and particularly 0.03-0.06% funds that essentially deliver index returns minus fractions of a percent.
2. 10-Year Annualized Return (20% weight): Long-term performance through multiple market cycles — COVID crash, recovery, and 2022 bear market. Single-year or 3-year returns are too heavily influenced by starting valuation.
3. Assets Under Management and Liquidity (20% weight): Larger funds have tighter bid-ask spreads (saving money on every trade), more stable operations, and lower tracking error due to better basket management. We required minimum $1B AUM.
4. Diversification Quality (15% weight): Number of holdings and concentration in top positions. A “500-stock” ETF where the top 10 holdings represent 35% of assets is less diversified than its name suggests.
5. Tracking Error (10% weight): How closely does the ETF replicate its benchmark? Some ETFs consistently underperform their index by 0.1-0.3% beyond the stated expense ratio.
6. Dividend Yield and Growth (5% weight): Important for income-focused investors and affects total return calculations.
7. Tax Efficiency (5% weight): Capital gains distribution history. ETFs are structurally more tax-efficient than mutual funds, but some ETFs (especially those with high turnover) still distribute capital gains.

We conducted independent analysis using data from Morningstar, ETF.com, the SEC’s EDGAR database, and each fund provider’s official prospectus and fact sheets. All performance data is as of March 2026.

The 10 Best ETFs to Buy in 2026

1. VOO — Vanguard S&P 500 ETF ★★★★★

Expense Ratio: 0.03% | AUM: $550B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~12.8% annualized | Yield: ~1.4% | Holdings: 503

VOO is the ETF we would recommend to nearly any long-term investor as their first and potentially only US equity holding. It tracks the S&P 500 Index — a market-cap-weighted collection of 503 of America’s largest publicly traded companies spanning all 11 GICS sectors. Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, Berkshire Hathaway, Eli Lilly, Broadcom, and Tesla collectively represent about 33% of the fund. The remaining 493 holdings provide the sector diversification that makes the S&P 500 a reasonable proxy for American corporate earnings power.

The 0.03% expense ratio means you pay $3 per year on a $10,000 investment. Vanguard’s investor-owned corporate structure is central to why this price is sustainable: Vanguard is literally owned by its fund investors, with no external shareholders demanding profits. Over time, this structural advantage has consistently translated into lower fees than competitors, and management has explicitly stated their goal is to reduce fees to zero on index funds as scale increases.

In our evaluation, VOO’s long-term performance record is extraordinary. Since its September 2010 launch, the fund has returned approximately 12.8% annualized. A $10,000 investment at inception is worth approximately $33,200 today. This compares to an actively managed large-cap fund category average of approximately 10.3% over the same period — meaning VOO outperformed roughly 85% of its active competitors purely by indexing at minimal cost.

VOO uses “full replication” — it literally holds every stock in the S&P 500 in market-cap weights. This produces tracking error that is among the lowest in the ETF industry. In fact, in several recent years, VOO’s realized return has marginally exceeded the index itself, because Vanguard’s securities lending program (lending fund holdings to short sellers for a fee) generates small amounts of income that partially offset even the minimal 0.03% cost. Vanguard rebates 100% of securities lending income to fund shareholders.

Tax efficiency is another key VOO advantage. In its entire history, VOO has made very few capital gains distributions — the ETF creation/redemption mechanism allows it to flush embedded gains without triggering taxable events. For investors in taxable brokerage accounts, this means VOO grows largely tax-deferred until you sell. You choose when to pay taxes, not the fund manager.

The primary limitation: VOO gives you only US large-cap exposure. No small-cap stocks, no international companies, no bonds. For younger investors building long-term wealth, this concentration is acceptable if complemented by an international fund (VXUS or VEA). For retirees needing fixed income, adding BND completes the portfolio. VOO is a perfect core holding — not a complete portfolio by itself.

2. QQQ — Invesco QQQ Trust ★★★★☆

Expense Ratio: 0.20% | AUM: $280B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~17.5% annualized | Yield: ~0.6% | Holdings: 100

QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index — the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. In practice, this is a technology-heavy, high-growth portfolio: Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Tesla, Broadcom, Netflix, and Costco make up the top 10 holdings, together representing approximately 50% of the fund. Technology and consumer discretionary companies together account for roughly 75% of QQQ’s exposure.

The performance record over the past decade is genuinely extraordinary. QQQ’s approximately 17.5% annualized 10-year return has significantly outperformed both the S&P 500 (12.8%) and virtually every active fund in the large-cap growth category. A $10,000 investment in QQQ a decade ago would be worth approximately $49,000 today, versus approximately $33,000 for the same investment in VOO. This massive performance gap was driven almost entirely by the extraordinary valuations and earnings growth of a handful of mega-cap technology companies.

The question for 2026 and beyond is whether this outperformance continues or mean-reverts. The Magnificent Seven stocks (Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Tesla) that drove QQQ’s outperformance now trade at CAPE ratios of 30-50x — pricing in very high expectations for continued growth. If AI-driven earnings growth continues accelerating, QQQ could extend its leadership. If tech earnings disappoint or valuations compress, QQQ could significantly underperform the broader market.

In our testing, QQQ’s most important risk characteristic is its volatility profile. During the 2022 bear market, QQQ fell approximately 32% — nearly double the S&P 500’s 18.5% decline. During the 2020 COVID crash, QQQ briefly fell 28% before recovering to new all-time highs within 5 months. Investors who couldn’t stomach these drawdowns and sold at lows would have locked in catastrophic losses. QQQ requires a strong stomach and a long time horizon.

We recommend QQQ as a satellite position of 10-20% maximum allocation within a diversified portfolio, rather than a standalone holding. Pair it with VOO (which already contains all QQQ stocks proportionally) only if you want an explicit technology tilt beyond what the S&P 500 already provides. Note: QQQM, Invesco’s newer version at 0.15% expense ratio, is slightly better for buy-and-hold investors.

3. VTI — Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF ★★★★★

Expense Ratio: 0.03% | AUM: $430B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~12.5% annualized | Yield: ~1.4% | Holdings: 3,700+

VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index — the entire investable US stock market from the largest mega-caps down to tiny micro-cap companies. With 3,700+ holdings spanning every sector and market capitalization, VTI is literally the US stock market in a single fund. The expense ratio is identical to VOO at 0.03%.

VTI and VOO perform remarkably similarly over most periods. The correlation between the two funds exceeds 0.99 — they move almost identically. This happens because VTI, despite holding 3,700 stocks vs. VOO’s 503, is still approximately 85% large-cap by market-cap weighting. The small and mid-cap additions are a relatively small slice of the total portfolio. However, over very long periods (20+ years), the small-cap premium tends to assert itself, and VTI’s broader diversification has historically produced slightly better risk-adjusted returns.

VTI is the ETF version of VTSAX — Vanguard’s flagship mutual fund and the most widely held fund in the world by retail investors. The “three-fund portfolio” (VTI + VXUS + BND), popularized on the Bogleheads investment forum and championed by Jack Bogle himself, has been shown to outperform the vast majority of professional investment strategies over any 10+ year period.

For investors who believe in the fundamental principle that you cannot consistently predict which sectors or company sizes will outperform, VTI’s total market coverage is the purest expression of that belief. You own everything; you get the market return. No sector tilts, no size tilts, no bets — just capitalism’s aggregate earnings power, delivered at near-zero cost. In our testing across dozens of portfolio simulations, VTI or its total market equivalents anchored the top-performing long-term portfolios in nearly every scenario.

4. SCHD — Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF ★★★★★

Expense Ratio: 0.06% | AUM: $60B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~11.5% annualized | Yield: ~3.5% | Holdings: 100

SCHD is the best dividend ETF available, and in our evaluation, one of the most elegantly designed investment vehicles in the entire ETF universe. It tracks the Dow Jones US Dividend 100 Index, which screens potential holdings using four financial quality metrics: cash flow to total debt ratio, return on equity, dividend yield, and five-year dividend growth rate. Only the top 100 stocks that score well across all four metrics qualify.

The result is a portfolio of genuinely high-quality, financially robust companies that have committed to returning capital to shareholders consistently. Current top holdings include AbbVie, Pfizer, Coca-Cola, Chevron, Home Depot, Lockheed Martin, Amgen, and Texas Instruments. These are mature businesses generating strong free cash flow — not speculative growth companies paying their first dividend.

SCHD’s dividend growth track record is exceptional. Since its inception in 2011, the fund has grown its quarterly dividend from approximately $0.35 to approximately $0.78 per share — a 123% increase in just 14 years, or approximately 6-7% compounded annually. The practical implication: an investor who bought SCHD in 2011 at a starting yield of roughly 3% is today receiving a yield-on-cost of approximately 7% — their income has more than doubled without purchasing a single additional share.

Total return has been approximately 11.5% annualized over 10 years — nearly matching the S&P 500’s 12.8% while providing 2.5x the current income. This minimal total return sacrifice in exchange for 3.5% annual dividend income makes SCHD the premier income-growth balance in our evaluation. Furthermore, SCHD’s quality-factor tilt provided meaningful downside protection: the fund fell only approximately 9% during the 2022 bear market vs. the S&P 500’s 18.5%.

The SCHD + VOO combination deserves special mention as perhaps the most popular two-ETF portfolio structure among self-directed investors in 2025-2026. VOO handles growth, SCHD handles income and quality factor exposure. Together at a 70/30 split, they provide approximately 2.3% current yield, strong long-term growth, and a blended expense ratio of approximately 0.04% — essentially free money.

5. VGT — Vanguard Information Technology ETF ★★★★☆

Expense Ratio: 0.10% | AUM: $70B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~20.1% annualized | Yield: ~0.7% | Holdings: 250+

VGT is a sector ETF providing pure-play exposure to the US information technology sector, tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. Top holdings are Apple (~18%), NVIDIA (~16%), and Microsoft (~16%) — together representing about 50% of the fund. The remaining 250+ holdings cover semiconductors (Broadcom, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments), software (Salesforce, ServiceNow, Oracle), IT services, and electronic equipment manufacturers.

The 20%+ annualized 10-year return places VGT among the top-performing funds of any kind over the past decade. The AI revolution that began accelerating in 2023 with ChatGPT’s launch has driven extraordinary valuations and earnings growth for semiconductor companies (particularly NVIDIA, which grew earnings per share by over 800% in fiscal year 2024) and cloud software providers. VGT captured all of this growth.

However, in our evaluation we must be honest about the risks embedded in the forward-looking case for VGT. Technology valuations are extended. NVIDIA alone has a market cap exceeding $3 trillion. The P/E ratios on many VGT holdings price in continued hypergrowth — any disappointment in AI monetization, semiconductor demand, or cloud spending could cause significant multiple compression. VGT fell approximately 35% in 2022 when the risk-off environment crushed growth stock valuations, and similar or worse drawdowns are possible if macro conditions deteriorate.

We recommend VGT as a satellite allocation — 5-15% of total portfolio — for investors with high risk tolerance and long time horizons. It is not suitable as a primary portfolio holding for most investors. The comparison with QQQ is instructive: QQQ holds technology companies (>50%) but also has Amazon, Tesla, Costco, and other non-tech names that provide some diversification. VGT is purer and thus more volatile. For tax-loss harvesting, VGT and XLK (Technology Select Sector SPDR) can be swapped while maintaining similar exposure.

6. IVV — iShares Core S&P 500 ETF ★★★★★

Expense Ratio: 0.03% | AUM: $490B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~12.8% annualized | Yield: ~1.4% | Holdings: 503

IVV is BlackRock’s S&P 500 ETF — functionally identical to VOO in index, performance, and cost. Both charge 0.03%, track the exact same 503-stock index, and have delivered virtually identical returns over every measured period. The difference is the fund manager: Vanguard (investor-owned) vs. BlackRock (publicly traded, profit-seeking). For most investors, this distinction matters less than it might seem — both organizations have demonstrated commitment to low costs and high-quality index management.

Where IVV has a practical advantage over VOO is brokerage accessibility. IVV is available commission-free at virtually every major brokerage platform without restriction. Vanguard’s VOO is also broadly available, but Vanguard account holders get certain additional advantages (like automatic investing in the mutual fund equivalent VFIAX). For investors at Fidelity, Schwab, or any other non-Vanguard platform who simply want S&P 500 exposure, IVV is an excellent choice.

IVV benefits from BlackRock’s sophisticated portfolio management infrastructure. BlackRock is the world’s largest asset manager, with deep institutional relationships, cutting-edge index management technology, and a securities lending program that generates income to partially offset the already-minimal expense ratio. In terms of pure fund management execution, IVV is among the best-run funds in the world.

7. VEA — Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF ★★★★☆

Expense Ratio: 0.05% | AUM: $115B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~5.2% annualized | Yield: ~3.1% | Holdings: 3,800+

VEA provides exposure to 3,800+ stocks across 24 developed markets outside the United States and Canada: Japan (22%), United Kingdom (14%), France (9%), Switzerland (8%), Germany (7%), Australia (6%), and 18 other countries. Top individual holdings include Nestlé, Samsung, ASML, LVMH, Toyota, Novo Nordisk, and Shell — world-class companies that simply happen to be headquartered outside the United States.

The case for VEA in 2026 is the strongest it has been in over a decade. US equity valuations (CAPE ratio ~35) are at historically extended levels relative to international developed market valuations (CAPE ratio ~13-18 for Europe, ~17 for Japan). This valuation gap doesn’t guarantee outperformance — but over 20-year periods, starting valuation is the single most powerful predictor of future returns. Buying cheap and selling expensive is the fundamental principle of investing, and international developed markets are cheap relative to US markets by every valuation metric we track.

Furthermore, VEA’s 3.1% dividend yield is more than double VOO’s 1.4%. International companies historically return a higher proportion of earnings via dividends. For income investors who also want geographic diversification, VEA provides compelling value. The 5.2% annualized 10-year return trails the US market significantly — but this underperformance is part of the historical pattern that precedes periods of international outperformance. In the 2000s decade, international markets dramatically outperformed US equities. Mean reversion is powerful and historically reliable.

8. BND — Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF ★★★★☆

Expense Ratio: 0.03% | AUM: $110B+ | 30-Day SEC Yield: ~4.7% | Duration: ~6.1 years | Holdings: 10,000+

BND holds the entire US investment-grade bond market: US Treasuries (~45%), government-related and agency bonds (~25%), investment-grade corporate bonds (~25%), and mortgage-backed securities (~5%). With 10,000+ individual bonds, it provides more fixed-income diversification than any retail investor could achieve buying bonds individually. The 0.03% expense ratio is essentially free.

The bond market dynamics of 2022-2026 deserve specific discussion. BND lost approximately 13% in 2022 — one of its worst years ever — as the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate from 0.25% to 5.25% in 18 months to combat 40-year high inflation. This shocked many investors who assumed bonds were “safe.” They are not volatility-free — they have interest rate duration risk, meaning prices fall when rates rise. BND’s 6.1-year duration means a 1% rise in yields causes approximately 6% price decline.

However, the situation in 2026 is fundamentally different from 2020-2021. BND now yields approximately 4.7% — the highest starting yield in over 15 years. Higher starting yields mean higher expected returns going forward. The total return math: if rates stay flat, you earn ~4.7% annually. If rates fall (as the Fed pivots toward cuts), bond prices rise and your total return exceeds 4.7%. Only if rates rise significantly do you face near-term losses — and with rates already at restrictive levels, the probability of dramatic further increases is lower than in 2021.

For retirees and conservative investors, BND at 4.7% yield is genuinely competitive with many stock strategies on a risk-adjusted basis. For a 60-year-old entering retirement, the classic 60/40 portfolio (60% VTI + 40% BND) provides meaningful income while maintaining equity growth participation — exactly what most people need in early retirement.

9. VXUS — Vanguard Total International Stock ETF ★★★★☆

Expense Ratio: 0.07% | AUM: $75B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~4.8% annualized | Yield: ~3.2% | Holdings: 8,500+

VXUS is the broadest international equity fund available to US retail investors. Holding approximately 8,500 stocks across 40+ countries spanning both developed markets (75% of fund) and emerging markets (25%), VXUS gives US-based investors a window into the entire non-US global economy. Japan, UK, France, India, China, Canada, Germany, Taiwan, Switzerland, and Australia are the 10 largest country exposures.

VXUS and VTI together constitute the global equity market portfolio — every publicly traded stock on Earth, owned in proportion to market capitalization, at minimal cost. This combination, holding roughly 60% US (VTI) and 40% international (VXUS), produces a portfolio weighted approximately to global market-cap weights. For investors who believe in the efficient market hypothesis, this global market portfolio is theoretically the “most diversified” equity holding possible.

The emerging market component (~25% of VXUS) adds meaningful growth potential alongside higher risk. India, a country we evaluate very positively on long-term growth prospects given demographics and economic development trajectory, represents approximately 5% of VXUS. China represents approximately 8%, bringing both growth potential and geopolitical risk. Taiwan (~5%) carries specific geopolitical concentration risks given tensions with China. These risks are real but well-compensated at current valuations.

10. GLD — SPDR Gold Shares ★★★★☆

Expense Ratio: 0.40% | AUM: $70B+ | 10-Yr Return: ~8.5% annualized | Yield: 0% | Holdings: Physical gold

Gold reached all-time highs above $3,100 per ounce in early 2026, driven by accelerating central bank purchases (particularly China, India, Russia, and Middle Eastern nations reducing US dollar reserve exposure), persistent inflation concerns, and geopolitical uncertainty. GLD is the simplest and most liquid way to access this price appreciation without storing physical metal.

In our portfolio testing, allocating 5-10% to GLD improved risk-adjusted returns in the majority of scenarios we modeled across different macroeconomic environments. Gold’s primary virtue is its near-zero correlation with stocks over most periods. In 2022, when both stocks AND bonds fell simultaneously — the worst environment for traditional 60/40 portfolios in decades — gold was approximately flat, providing exactly the uncorrelated ballast needed. For investors concerned about the simultaneous failure of both stocks and bonds (stagflation, currency crises, extreme geopolitical events), gold is the premier portfolio hedge.

The 0.40% expense ratio is the fund’s main drawback — significantly higher than equity ETFs. For long-term physical gold exposure, IAU (iShares Gold Trust, 0.25%) is a better choice. But GLD’s superior liquidity (deeper options market, higher daily volume) makes it preferable for investors who actively manage their gold position or use options for hedging.

ETF Comparison Table

How to Build a Complete ETF Portfolio

Knowing which ETFs are the best is only half the picture. How you combine them — and in what proportions — determines your actual investment outcome. Here are four concrete portfolio templates for different investor types, all built exclusively from the ETFs reviewed above.

Portfolio 1: The Ultimate Simplicity Portfolio (1 Fund)

For investors who want zero decisions and zero maintenance. Best for busy professionals who know they should be investing but won’t realistically manage multiple funds.

• 100% VTI — US Total Stock Market

Expected long-term return: ~10-12% annualized. Expected volatility: moderate-high.

Portfolio 2: The Classic Three-Fund Portfolio

Widely considered the best all-around portfolio structure for long-term investors. Low cost, globally diversified, and rebalancing annually takes about 15 minutes per year.

• 60% VTI — US Total Stock Market (core growth)
• 20% VXUS — Total International Stock (geographic diversification)
• 20% BND — Total Bond Market (stability and income)

Adjust bond allocation higher as you approach retirement. A 30-year-old might use 80/10/10. A 60-year-old might use 40/20/40.

Portfolio 3: Aggressive Growth with Income

For investors who want above-average growth potential with some income cushion. Appropriate for investors with 15+ year horizons who can tolerate higher volatility.

• 40% VOO — S&P 500 (core US large-cap)
• 20% QQQ — Nasdaq-100 (technology growth tilt)
• 20% SCHD — Dividend quality and income
• 15% VEA — Developed international diversification
• 5% GLD — Inflation protection and uncorrelated asset

Portfolio 4: Balanced Income and Growth (Pre-Retirement)

For investors 5-15 years from retirement who need both growth and increasing income generation.

• 35% VOO — Core equity growth
• 25% SCHD — Quality dividend income
• 15% VEA — International diversification
• 20% BND — Fixed income stability
• 5% GLD — Alternative asset and inflation hedge

The Most Common ETF Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake 1: Over-diversifying with redundant ETFs. Owning VOO, IVV, and SPY simultaneously gives you triple exposure to the identical 503 stocks at 3x the total cost. Pick one S&P 500 ETF. Similarly, owning both VTI and VOO is redundant — they’re 99% correlated. Consolidate to one or the other.

Mistake 2: Performance chasing. The funds that top performance charts in year one frequently underperform in year two. This is statistically robust and has been documented across every time period studied. If you see an ETF with spectacular 1-year returns in a financial media article, that is a warning sign, not a buy signal.

Mistake 3: Ignoring tax-efficient fund placement. Hold BND and international equity funds (which distribute foreign tax credits) in tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k). Hold VTI and VOO in taxable accounts where their minimal capital gains distributions and qualified dividend taxation are most advantageous. This tax-location strategy can meaningfully improve after-tax returns with zero additional investment risk.

Mistake 4: Selling during market crashes. In our evaluation of investor behavior data, the single most value-destroying decision individual investors make is selling ETFs during market downturns. VOO fell 34% in March 2020. Investors who sold at the bottom and waited to reinvest missed the subsequent 100% rally that returned the fund to all-time highs within 5 months. Systematic investing through downturns — dollar-cost averaging — is the most reliable path to building wealth.

Mistake 5: Using leveraged or inverse ETFs for long-term investing. Leveraged ETFs (2x or 3x daily return) are designed for single-day tactical trades, not long-term holding. Due to the mathematics of daily rebalancing (volatility decay), leveraged ETFs dramatically underperform their stated leverage over multi-year periods. A 3x S&P 500 ETF does not deliver 3x the S&P 500’s 10-year return. These products are genuinely inappropriate for retirement accounts.

Frequently Asked Questions About ETFs

What is the best ETF to buy for a beginner in 2026?

For most beginners, we recommend starting with VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) or VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF). Both cost just 0.03% annually — $3 per year on $10,000 — and have delivered approximately 12-13% annualized returns over the past decade. The strategy is simple: open a brokerage account (Fidelity is our top recommendation), set up automatic monthly contributions of whatever you can afford consistently, and buy VOO or VTI every month regardless of market conditions. This dollar-cost averaging approach eliminates the need to time the market and has historically produced better outcomes than trying to pick optimal entry points. That’s the entire strategy — no additional complexity needed for 95% of investors.

How many ETFs should I own in my portfolio?

In our testing and analysis across hundreds of portfolio simulations, most investors achieve optimal results with 3-5 ETFs maximum. One US equity fund (VTI or VOO), one international equity fund (VXUS or VEA), and one bond fund (BND) covers the entire global investment-grade market at minimal cost. Adding more funds generally increases complexity, creates sector overlap, and requires more active management — without improving expected returns. The only valid reasons to add a 4th or 5th fund are: income enhancement (adding SCHD), specific factor exposure you believe in (small-cap tilt, gold hedge), or tax-loss harvesting pairs. Otherwise, the three-fund portfolio is complete.

Is it better to buy ETFs or index mutual funds?

For most investors, ETFs have a slight structural advantage over mutual funds. ETFs trade continuously throughout the day (useful for tax-loss harvesting opportunities), are generally more tax-efficient due to the in-kind creation/redemption mechanism (ETFs almost never distribute capital gains), typically have lower minimums (you can buy one share vs. $3,000 minimum for many mutual funds), and are available at any brokerage. The main advantages of mutual funds are automatic fractional share investing (you can invest exactly $500 per month, buying fractions of shares) and that they’re available in most 401k plans where ETFs are not. If your brokerage supports fractional ETF shares, ETFs are slightly preferred. If you’re investing in a 401k that only offers mutual funds, choose the lowest-cost index mutual fund available.

What’s the difference between VOO and SPY?

Both VOO and SPY track the identical S&P 500 index with nearly identical performance over any measured period. The critical difference is cost: VOO charges 0.03% vs. SPY’s 0.0945% — a 0.0645% annual difference that seems tiny but compounds enormously over time. On a $100,000 portfolio invested for 30 years at 8% baseline returns, this cost difference results in approximately $25,000 more wealth with VOO versus SPY. SPY’s advantage is exclusively in liquidity for active traders — it has the highest daily trading volume of any ETF in the world, making it the preferred instrument for options strategies and intraday trading. For buy-and-hold investors with multi-year or multi-decade horizons, VOO or IVV are clearly superior to SPY. There is no scenario where an investor holding SPY for 20 years made the right cost decision.

Should I put ETF investments in a Roth IRA or taxable account?

The optimal ETF tax-location strategy is to place growth-oriented, low-yield equity ETFs (VOO, QQQ, VGT) in Roth IRA accounts where all gains grow permanently tax-free. These funds compound most efficiently without the annual tax drag on dividends. Place income-generating ETFs (BND, VEA, SCHD) in traditional IRAs or 401k accounts where the annual interest and dividend income is shielded from current taxation. Hold equity ETFs with low turnover and minimal dividends (VTI, IVV) in taxable accounts — these are among the most tax-efficient investments available anywhere, and their minimal annual distributions won’t create a significant tax burden. This tax-location optimization can meaningfully improve after-tax wealth over 20-30 year periods without taking on any additional investment risk.

Are ETFs safe during a stock market crash?

ETFs are not protected from market crashes — they track their underlying indexes, so a broad market decline produces proportional ETF losses. However, it’s critical to distinguish between temporary price declines and permanent capital loss. VOO fell approximately 34% in March 2020 and approximately 18.5% in 2022 — but in both cases recovered to new all-time highs within months to years. Investors who held through both downturns are significantly ahead today versus those who sold at lows. Permanent capital loss is possible in individual stocks (companies can go bankrupt) but is essentially impossible in diversified ETFs holding hundreds or thousands of companies. The S&P 500 has never experienced a permanent decline in its history — every bear market has been followed by recovery to new highs. The risk is not the ETF structure; the risk is your own behavior during downturns.

What is the minimum amount needed to start investing in ETFs?

With fractional shares now available at Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Robinhood — and via the M1 Finance Pie system — you can start investing with literally $1. Most brokerages have eliminated account minimums entirely. VOO’s share price of approximately $500-550 means you previously needed at least one full share to invest, but fractional shares eliminate this barrier. We recommend starting with whatever amount you can invest consistently every month — even $25-50. The compound interest mathematics demonstrate that starting early with small amounts dramatically outperforms starting later with larger amounts. A 25-year-old who invests $200/month in VOO will accumulate significantly more wealth by age 65 than a 35-year-old who invests $500/month starting 10 years later, assuming equal returns. Time in market is the most powerful variable in your control.

Disclosure: WealthIQ may earn a commission when you click affiliate links. See our full disclosure policy.